1. If it was a big of deal as the company made it seem and it was worth being fired over, then no, one should not have a second chance to redeem themselves. They could've been lying about everything else the entire time and no one would have known.
2. The rest of his images should be taken into consideration forever since he is now known for untrue material. Caution should be taken in fear that he might pull the same thing again.
3. The AP should have these rules so readers can be let in on the true story. Their minds shouldn't have a twisted perspective of the real idea.
4. I think there may have been others or other cameras around that captured the same image that clearly had something different about it. Also, maybe the photographer didn't do the best job at photoshopping and you could see a mistake or flaw, clearly enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment